Outcomes of Democracy · Class 10 Political Science: 224 MCQs with answers
Showing 200 of 224 multiple-choice questions from this kit.
Warm-up · 3 questions
Q1. Roughly how many countries today claim and practise some kind of democratic politics?
BeginnerShow answer & explanation
over a hundred
They share formal constitutions, elections, parties and guaranteed rights of citizens.
Q2. State the five reasons for which democracy was judged a better form of government.
BeginnerShow answer & explanation
—
Q3. What should be the most basic outcome of democracy, and why?
BeginnerShow answer & explanation
—
Building up · 46 questions
Q4. Which set correctly names the features common to most of these countries?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Formal constitutions, elections, parties and guaranteed rights of citizens
These are the features by which such countries claim to practise some kind of democratic politics.
Q5. What position does fascination for democracy often push people into?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
That democracy can address all socio-economic and political problems
Expecting too much of a single thing guarantees disappointment and then misdirects the blame.
Q6. Which preliminary step helps us judge democracy's results?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Recognising that democracy is just a form of government
A democratic framework creates opportunities, but citizens must use them to produce results.
Q7. Complete the chapter's statement: democracy can only create conditions for achieving something, and:
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
citizens must use democratic opportunities to pursue those goals
Creating conditions and achieving goals are two different jobs, and only the first belongs to a form of government.
Q8. In which five respects does the chapter go on to examine democracy's record?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Government quality, development, inequality, social conflict, and dignity and freedom
Each section states what may reasonably be expected and then reports what has actually happened.
Q9. Which of the five reasons concerns the ability of a democracy to change course when it has gone wrong?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
It allows room to correct mistakes
The five are equality, dignity, quality of decision-making, resolving conflicts, and room to correct mistakes.
Q10. Which alternatives to democracy are named when people are asked what they prefer?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Rule by a monarch, by the military or by religious leaders
Most people support democracy against all of these, while many remain dissatisfied with democracy in practice.
Q11. Explain the dilemma about democracy with which the chapter begins.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q12. How should the outcomes of democracy be assessed? Explain with reference to the expectations we bring to it.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the five reasons: equality, dignity, quality of decision-making, resolving conflicts, room to correct mistakes. 1 mark — these are expectations to be tested, drawn from the Class IX discussion. 1 mark — the dilemma: supported against alternatives, yet dissatisfaction with democracy in practice…
Q13. 'Democracy is only a way of governing. All it can do is set up the conditions for reaching a goal.' Discuss the importance of this statement for judging democracy.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — recognising this is the first step towards thinking carefully about outcomes. 1 mark — the mistake it corrects: that democracy can address all socio-economic and political problems. 1 mark — the two wrong turns: blaming the idea of democracy, or doubting whether we live in one. 1 mark — democr…
Q14. Examine the claim that widespread dissatisfaction with democracy shows that democracy has failed.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — many are dissatisfied with democracy in practice; this is accepted as true. 1 mark — the same people mostly support democracy against alternatives such as a monarch, the military or religious leaders. 1 mark — dissatisfaction with a democracy is not a preference for an alternative; the two fin…
Q15. Which set names the practices and institutions by which a government's accountability can be measured?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Regular, free and fair elections; open public debate on major policies and legislations; citizens' right to information
These three are what to look for if you want to measure democracies on this expected outcome.
Q16. What is 'all one can say' in favour of democratic regimes on elections, debate and information?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
That they are much better than any non-democratic regime in these respects
The verdict is deliberately modest: the comparison is with the alternatives, not with an ideal.
Q17. Which two substantive expectations does the chapter say are reasonable to hold of democracy?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
A government that listens to people and limits corruption
These go beyond procedure to what the government actually does.
Q18. What do people in South Asia believe about the suitability of democracy for their own country?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Very few doubt the suitability of democracy for their own country
People in both democratic and non-democratic countries often prefer representatives chosen by voters.
Q19. Is democratic government less efficient? Explain the chapter's answer.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q20. What is transparency, and why is it often missing from non-democratic government?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q21. 'Democracy produces an accountable, responsive and legitimate government.' Examine this statement.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the right to choose and control rulers, and participation in decisions, yield the expectation of accountable and responsive government. 1 mark — decisions based on norms and procedures make transparency possible; often missing from non-democracies. 1 mark — the three measures: elections, publi…
Q22. 'Democratic government may be slow, but its decisions may be more effective.' Explain, with reference to efficiency and transparency.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the concession: non-democratic rulers can be very quick and efficient, free of deliberation and concern for majorities and opinion. 1 mark — democracy is based on deliberation and negotiation, so some delay is bound to occur. 1 mark — fast decisions may not be accepted by the people and may fa…
Q23. Why is there overwhelming support for democracy all over the world despite its poor record on several counts?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the procedural record: shortfalls on fair elections, debate on every decision, and sharing information. 1 mark — the substantive record: needs frustrated, majority demands ignored, corruption; also slowness. 1 mark — democracies are much better than non-democratic regimes on elections, debate…
Q24. Which set correctly names factors on which economic development depends?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Population size, the global situation, cooperation from other countries, and economic priorities
These are the factors the chapter names besides the form of government.
Q25. What may we reasonably expect of democracy in respect of economic growth?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
That it will not lag behind dictatorships
No guarantee, but no lag — and democracy is preferred for its several other positive outcomes.
Q26. In which two democracies does the bottom 20 per cent receive less than 3 per cent of national income?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
South Africa and Brazil
In both, the top 20 per cent take more than 60 per cent of national income.
Q27. What does political equality mean in a democracy?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
That all individuals have equal weight in electing representatives
Equal votes do not by themselves distribute wealth, which is the point of the contrast.
Q28. Which set correctly names the basic needs that those at the bottom sometimes find difficult to meet?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Food, clothing, house, education and health
Their incomes have been declining while the share of the ultra-rich has been rising.
Q29. In which country does the chapter say more than half the population lives in poverty?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Bangladesh
Some countries have far more poverty than India; Bangladesh is the chapter's example.
Q30. What happens to the incomes of those at the bottom of society, according to the chapter?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
They have been declining
Meanwhile the share of the ultra-rich in total income has been increasing.
Q31. What does the evidence show about economic growth under democracies and dictatorships?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q32. What does the evidence on income inequality within democracies show?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q33. 'Democracy is not a guarantee of economic development.' Examine this statement with evidence.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the expectation that good government would produce development was not fulfilled by many democracies. 1 mark — across all countries, dictatorships grew slightly faster, 4.42 against 3.95. 1 mark — among poor countries the difference was negligible, 4.34 against 4.28. 1 mark — development depen…
Q34. 'Democracies are based on political equality, yet economic inequality grows.' Explain this statement.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — it is reasonable, perhaps more than development, to expect democracies to reduce disparities. 1 mark — political equality: every individual has equal weight in electing representatives. 1 mark — growing economic inequalities develop in parallel. 1 mark — the ultra-rich hold a highly disproport…
Q35. Why have democratically elected governments not done more to reduce poverty? Discuss with reference to the chapter.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the reasoning: democracy is majority rule and the poor are the majority. 1 mark — the poor are a large proportion of voters and no party wants to lose their votes. 1 mark — yet elected governments are not as keen to address poverty as expected. 1 mark — worse elsewhere: Bangladesh, or dependen…
Q36. If conflicts cannot be permanently resolved, what does the chapter say democracy is best suited to produce?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Respect for differences and mechanisms to negotiate them
This is a smaller claim than ending conflict, and much easier to defend.
Q37. What does the chapter call the ability of democratic regimes to handle social differences, divisions and conflicts?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
A definite plus point
Here, unusually, the chapter speaks without hedging — though the plus point depends on two conditions.
Q38. Which country's experience does the chapter use to show that a democracy must meet two conditions to accommodate diversity?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka was a democracy and still went badly wrong, which is why being a democracy is not enough on its own.
Q39. Why must the majority work with the minority?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
So that governments function to represent the general view
A government representing only a majority's view would not be representing the general view.
Q40. Which set correctly names the kinds of majority community the second condition warns against?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Religion, race or linguistic group
These are identities people are born into, which is why a majority defined by them can lock others out permanently.
Q41. Democracy remains accommodative only while every citizen has what opportunity?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
a chance of being in majority at some point of time
The test is whether anyone is permanently locked out of ever being in the majority.
Q42. What reduces the possibility of social tensions in a democracy becoming explosive?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
The procedure democracies develop to conduct their competition
A contest fought by rules is much less likely to become a fight.
Q43. How do democracies accommodate social diversity?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Q44. 'Democracy accommodates social diversity.' Examine this statement.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — a fair expectation of harmonious social life; Belgium as an example. 1 mark — democracies develop a procedure to conduct competition, reducing the chance of violence. 1 mark — no society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts; democracy is best suited to respecting and negotiating differe…
Q45. Explain the two conditions a democracy must fulfil in order to accommodate social diversity, and why Sri Lanka is used to illustrate them.
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — handling differences is a definite plus point, but Sri Lanka shows two conditions are needed. 1 mark — condition one: democracy is not simply rule by majority opinion. 1 mark — the majority must work with the minority to represent the general view; opinions are not permanent. 1 mark — conditio…
Q46. 'Democracy only ensures that people do not break each other's heads. This is not harmony.' How far do you agree?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
—
Any five points. 1 mark — the chapter does not claim perfect harmony; no society can permanently resolve conflicts. 1 mark — democracies develop procedures for competition, reducing the chance of violence. 1 mark — non-violence is the condition under which respect and negotiation can take place. 1 mark — democracy is b…
Q47. What has democracy in India done for disadvantaged and discriminated castes?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
Strengthened their claims for equal status and equal opportunity
Caste atrocities still occur, but they lack moral and legal foundations.
Q48. How does the chapter describe the role of expectations from democracy?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
As the criteria for judging any democratic country
That is exactly what the chapter has done under each of its five heads.
Q49. What does the chapter say is most distinctive about democracy?
IntermediateShow answer & explanation
That its examination never gets over
As democracy passes one test, it produces another.
Topper level · 151 questions
Q50. A student writes in an examination that democracy guarantees equality among citizens and a high quality of decision-making. What is wrong with this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
These are the expectations the chapter sets out to test, not conclusions it has already reached
The five reasons came from the Class IX discussion, and the chapter exists to ask whether they are realised.
Q51. Which of the following is NOT among the five reasons for which democracy was judged better than the alternatives?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
It guarantees a higher rate of economic growth
Economic growth is examined later in the chapter and is not among the grounds on which democracy was judged better.
Q52. A survey finds that most people in a country prefer democracy to rule by a monarch, the military or religious leaders, while most are also dissatisfied with how their own democracy works. What does the chapter call this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A puzzle: democracy can be admired as an ideal yet disappoint in daily practice
The dilemma invites us to think hard about the outcomes of democracy rather than to abandon the principle.
Q53. What does the chapter do with the gap between democracy in principle and democracy in practice?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Treats it as a reason to examine the outcomes of democracy carefully
The dilemma sharpens into a question about moral and prudential grounds for supporting democracy.
Q54. Someone argues that democracy should be supported because representing people is right in itself, whatever the results. What kind of reason is being given?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A moral reason
The chapter asks whether there are also reasons of the other kind, which appeal to the good consequences that follow.
Q55. Why does the chapter look for reasons of the prudential kind at all?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because it asks whether democracy is preferred only on grounds of rightness, or whether its actual results also support it
The rest of the chapter is largely an attempt to answer this by examining what democracy actually produces.
Q56. Two countries both hold elections and guarantee rights, but one is wealthy and the other poor, with entirely different cultures. What does the chapter conclude from such cases?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That what may be achieved or not achieved under each will be very different, since democracies differ in social situations, economic achievements and cultures
Yet the chapter still asks what may be expected from every democracy just because it is a democracy.
Q57. Given how widely democracies differ, which question does the chapter ask instead of comparing their achievements?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Can democracy itself justify common expectations about government?
Countries too different to be compared on results can still be compared against a common expectation.
Q58. A citizen concludes from an unsolved public problem that his country cannot really be a democracy. Which wrong turn is this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Doubting whether we are living in a democracy
The other wrong turn is to blame the idea of democracy; both follow from expecting democracy to solve everything.
Q59. What are the two wrong turns the chapter warns against when expectations go unmet?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Blaming the idea of democracy, or doubting whether we are living in a democracy
One blames the idea; the other denies the fact. Both begin from the same mistake.
Q60. A law guarantees a right that almost nobody uses. On the chapter's account, what does this show?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That a condition was created and not taken advantage of, since democracy creates conditions while citizens achieve goals
A form of government cannot do the second job, which belongs to citizens.
Q61. A problem remains unsolved after years in a democracy. Which two questions does the chapter's framework suggest asking?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Whether the conditions for solving it existed, and whether anyone took advantage of them
Misdirected blame is the practical cost of forgetting what a form of government can and cannot do.
Q62. Why does the chapter devote a whole opening section to how outcomes should be assessed?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because an expectation has to be stated before any record can be judged against it
Otherwise a complaint has nothing to measure against and a defence has nothing to meet.
Q63. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Blaming democracy for every unsolved problem is a mistake. Reason (R): Democracy is a way of choosing rulers and of holding them to account.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Both are true, but defining democracy does not settle what may fairly be blamed on it; that it only creates conditions does.
Q64. Consider the following statements about how to assess democracy's outcomes. I. Democracy is just a form of government. II. It can only create conditions for achieving something. III. Citizens must take advantage of those conditions. IV. Democracy can address all socio-economic and political problems. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct. Statement IV is the very position the chapter warns our fascination for democracy pushes us into.
Q65. Which pairing of a finding with what it does NOT mean is correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Many are dissatisfied with democracy in practice — this does not mean they want a monarch, the military or religious leaders
Each of the other three collapses two different things into one, which is exactly the error the section is written to prevent.
Q66. Why does the chapter recall the Class IX discussion at all?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because the five reasons reached there are the expectations this chapter tests, so it is continuing an argument rather than starting one
The class discussion concluded that democracy compares favourably with dictatorship and other alternatives.
Q67. A commentator says that since democracies differ so much in wealth and culture, judging them by a single standard is meaningless. How does the chapter answer?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
By distinguishing what each country achieves, which does differ, from what may be expected of any country simply for being a democracy
What may be achieved or not achieved under each will be very different, and yet a common expectation may still be stated.
Q68. Which of the five reasons is about handling disagreement between groups rather than about individuals?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
It provides a method to resolve conflicts
The later sections of the chapter test this expectation against the record on social differences and conflict.
Q69. A politician promises that adopting democratic institutions will by itself end poverty, corruption and social division. Which warning does the chapter offer?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democracy is just a form of government which can only create conditions, so expecting it to address all socio-economic and political problems sets up a disappointment
And when the expectations are not met, people begin blaming the idea of democracy or doubting whether they live in one.
Q70. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): The chapter opens with a method for assessing outcomes rather than with a verdict on democracy. Reason (R): The five expectations of democracy were reached in the Class IX textbook.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Both statements are true, but the method comes first because an expectation must be stated before a record can be judged against it, not because of where the expectations originated.
Q71. Which statement best expresses the division of work the chapter sets out?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Democracy creates the conditions and citizens take advantage of them to achieve the goals
A form of government cannot do the second job, which is why the correction has to come first.
Q72. A campaign succeeds because citizens used the freedoms available to them under a democratic constitution. Which part of the chapter's framework does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democracy created the conditions and the citizens took advantage of them
This is the positive case of the same division of work that explains an unused right.
Q73. Why is the phrase 'just a form of government' doing important work in the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because it limits what may fairly be demanded of democracy and so keeps the assessment honest
It divides the work between creating conditions and achieving goals, and every later section rests on that division.
Q74. Consider the following about the countries that claim to practise democratic politics. I. They have formal constitutions. II. They hold elections and have parties. III. They guarantee rights of citizens. IV. They are alike in their social situations and economic achievements. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct. These democracies are very much different from each other in social situations, economic achievements and cultures.
Q75. A student asks why the chapter reports poor records as well as good ones. What is the reason?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because each section states what may reasonably be expected and then reports what has actually happened, which is the method of the chapter
Stating an expectation and then testing it honestly is what makes the assessment worth anything.
Q76. Which of these correctly describes the relationship between the five reasons and the rest of the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The five reasons are the expectations, and the later sections examine the record against them
Are these expectations realised under democracies? — that is the question the chapter puts before examining anything.
Q77. Which conclusion would the chapter reject?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because some expectations of democracy are unmet, the idea of democracy is mistaken
Blaming the idea when expectations go unmet is one of the two wrong turns the chapter names.
Q78. If democracies differ so greatly from one another, how can any common expectation be stated?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q79. What mistake does our fascination for democracy lead to, and what follows from it?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q80. 'Democracy is just a form of government.' Explain what follows from this.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q81. Why does the chapter discuss how to assess outcomes before assessing any of them?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q82. A state promises its citizens good roads and clean water but gives them no way of choosing or removing the officials in charge. Which basic outcome of democracy is missing?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A government accountable to the citizens, since people have neither the right to choose their rulers nor control over them
Delivering services is not the same as being answerable for them; accountability requires choice and control.
Q83. Why does the chapter keep 'accountable' and 'responsive' as two separate demands?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because being answerable to citizens is not the same as meeting their needs and expectations, and a government may do one without the other
The most basic outcome is a government that is both accountable to the citizens and responsive to their needs and expectations.
Q84. A military government announces and implements a new tax in a single week, while a democratic legislature takes months over a similar measure. What does the chapter concede about this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That non-democratic rulers can be very quick and efficient, since they need not bother about deliberation or worry about majorities and public opinion
The chapter concedes the point first and then changes the measure from speed to effectiveness.
Q85. A city council takes eight months to approve a new water scheme after hearings, committee reports and two rounds of amendment. What feature of democracy makes such delay unavoidable?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democracy is based on deliberation and negotiation
Some delay is bound to take place; the chapter argues the procedure may make the decision more acceptable and more effective.
Q86. A decree is announced overnight and then resisted for years; a law debated for months is accepted with little protest. Which argument of the chapter does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That a decision following procedures may be more acceptable and more effective, so the cost of time is perhaps worth it
A fast decision not accepted by the people may face problems, which is the cost the quick decision hides.
Q87. Why does the chapter say the cost of time is 'perhaps' worth it rather than certainly?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because it claims only that delay may buy acceptance and acceptance may make a decision work, not that democracy is always faster or always more effective
The careful wording keeps the claim to what can actually be defended.
Q88. A citizen wants to find out whether a contract for a local road was awarded according to the correct procedure, and is able to do so. What is this called?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Transparency
Transparency gives citizens a way to inspect how a decision was reached.
Q89. Why is transparency possible in a democracy and often missing elsewhere?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because democracy ensures that decision making is based on norms and procedures, which can be examined
A decision made by fixed procedure can be checked against that procedure.
Q90. A student writes that transparency means a democratic government always takes good decisions. What is wrong with this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Transparency is a citizen's means of checking how decisions were made, not a guarantee that they are good
It gives the citizen the right and the means to examine whether the correct procedures were followed.
Q91. A country holds elections every five years on schedule, but candidates without money are almost never heard. How does the chapter describe this pattern?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
As part of a mixed record: democracies have done better at regular and free elections than at elections that give everyone a fair chance
Elections are held, but not everyone has a fair chance in them — the success and the shortfall pair up.
Q92. On which of the three measures do democratic governments have the weakest record?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Sharing information with citizens
Democracies still have a weak record on giving citizens complete information.
Q93. Consider the following statements about democracy's procedural record. I. Democracies have done better at holding regular, free elections. II. Most democracies subject every decision to public debate. III. Their record on sharing information is not very good. IV. They are much better than non-democratic regimes in these respects. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, III and IV
I, III and IV are correct. Most democracies fall short of subjecting every decision to public debate.
Q94. A newspaper series documents one corruption scandal after another under an elected government. What does the chapter conclude from such 'routine tales'?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democracy is not free of the evil of corruption
The record on corruption is not impressive, and the chapter says so plainly before making any comparison.
Q95. A commentator argues that because elected governments are corrupt, a military regime would be cleaner. Which statement in the chapter answers this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the evidence does not show non-democratic systems are cleaner or more responsive
A poor record is judged against the alternatives, not against perfection.
Q96. Which two failings does the chapter attribute to democracies on the substantive record?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Often frustrating the needs of the people, and often ignoring the demands of a majority of the population
Together with routine corruption, these make the substantive record not impressive.
Q97. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democratic government is certainly better than its alternatives in one respect. Reason (R): Democratic government is legitimate government, the people's own government.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Democratic government may be slow or imperfect, yet it has the legitimacy of being people's own government.
Q98. An elected government is slow, somewhat inefficient and occasionally corrupt. On the chapter's account, what advantage does it still hold over an efficient dictatorship?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
It is legitimate government — the people's own government
Legitimacy survives every other shortfall the chapter concedes.
Q99. Why does the chapter repeat every shortfall of democracy in the same sentence that names legitimacy?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
To show that legitimacy survives all of them, so the advantage is not bought by ignoring the weaknesses
It may be slower or imperfect, but democratic authority rests on public consent.
Q100. A survey finds that people in a country without a democratic government still say they want to be ruled by representatives they elect. What does the chapter draw from evidence like this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That there is overwhelming support for the idea of democracy all over the world, including where there is no democratic regime
The South Asian evidence shows support in countries with democratic regimes as well as without.
Q101. In the South Asian survey, democracy was preferred over dictatorship everywhere except one country. Which country, and what did the largest group there say?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Pakistan; that it did not matter to them
The largest group in Pakistan said the choice did not matter to them, rather than preferring dictatorship.
Q102. Why is democracy's ability to generate its own support called an outcome in itself?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because people dissatisfied with how democracy works still want to be governed by it, and that continuing support is itself something democracy produces
It returns to the dilemma of the first topic: dissatisfaction and support sit together.
Q103. Which pairing of an expectation with democracy's record is correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Open public debate — greater success in setting up conditions for it, but most fall short of subjecting every decision to it
The other three misstate the record, which on corruption, information and needs is not good.
Q104. A student argues that democracy's slowness proves it is the worse form of government. Which reply follows the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That slowness is conceded, but a decision that follows procedures may be more acceptable and more effective, and democratic government is legitimate in a way the alternatives are not
The chapter concedes speed and wins on effectiveness, transparency and legitimacy.
Q105. Which of the following is NOT one of the things the chapter says we may expect from democracy on this outcome?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A government that takes decisions faster than any alternative
Speed is precisely what the chapter concedes to non-democratic rulers.
Q106. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democracy's record on being attentive to people's needs and free of corruption is not impressive. Reason (R): Evidence does not show that non-democratic systems are cleaner or more responsive.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Both are stated in the chapter, but the comparison with non-democracies does not explain democracy's own poor record; it places it in context.
Q107. A government holds regular elections and permits open debate but refuses to release information about how it spends public money. On which of the three measures is it failing?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Citizens' right to information about the government and its functioning
This is the measure on which democratic governments have the weakest record.
Q108. What does the phrase 'people's own government' capture that efficiency cannot?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the government is legitimate because the people chose it, whatever its speed or efficiency
This helps explain why many people continue to favour democracy.
Q109. Consider the following statements. I. Non-democratic rulers can be very quick in decision making. II. Democratic decisions may be more acceptable and more effective. III. Transparency is often missing from non-democratic government. IV. Democratic governments share information better than any other kind. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct; democratic systems still have a weak record on sharing information.
Q110. Why does the chapter measure accountability through institutions and practices rather than through the good intentions of rulers?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because institutions such as elections, debate and the right to information can be observed and compared across regimes, while intentions cannot
An outcome that can be measured is one that can be compared, which is what the assessment needs.
Q111. An elected government ignores the demands of most of its population on a major issue. Does this show that the country is not a democracy?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
No — the chapter acknowledges that democracies often ignore the demands of a majority of their population, as part of a record that is not impressive
Doubting whether one lives in a democracy because an expectation is unmet is one of the wrong turns the first topic warned against.
Q112. Which statement best describes the overall verdict of this section?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The record is mixed or poor on several measures, democracy is still much better than the alternatives on most of them, and it is certainly better in being legitimate
The section concedes speed, reports poor records honestly, and still establishes a comparative and a certain advantage.
Q113. Why is participation in decision making qualified by 'whenever possible and necessary'?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because citizens cannot take part in every decision, so the expectation is participation where it is possible and where the decision affects them all
The qualification keeps the expectation realistic, in the same spirit as treating democracy as just a form of government.
Q114. How can democracies be measured on the outcome of accountable government, and what does the record show?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q115. Assess democracy's record on responsiveness and corruption.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q116. 'Democratic government is legitimate government.' Explain.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q117. A speaker claims that because democracies produce good government, they must also produce faster development. What does the evidence show?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That in practice many democracies did not fulfil this expectation
The expectation seems fair, but the record between 1950 and 2000 does not bear it out.
Q118. A student reads that all dictatorships grew at 4.42 per cent and all democracies at 3.95 per cent between 1950 and 2000. What is the correct conclusion?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Dictatorships had a slightly higher rate of economic growth
The gap is under half a percentage point — slight, not great.
Q119. When only poor countries are compared, poor dictatorships grew at 4.34 and poor democracies at 4.28 per cent. What does this show?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the difference in growth between poor dictatorships and poor democracies is negligible
The poor-country comparison nearly erases the gap seen in the all-country figures.
Q120. Why is the poor-country comparison the fairer one for a country like India?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because it compares countries at a similar level of development, where the difference turns out to be negligible
An average across all countries can hide the comparison that matters most for a less developed country.
Q121. A country's growth slows sharply during a worldwide recession although its government has not changed. Which factor affecting development does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The global situation
Development depends on population size, the global situation, cooperation from other countries and economic priorities, as well as on government.
Q122. Why does the chapter say slower growth alone cannot be a reason to reject democracy?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because development depends on several factors besides the form of government, so a small gap cannot be laid at democracy's door alone
When an outcome has many causes, a small difference in it cannot be blamed on one cause.
Q123. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democracy cannot be called a guarantee of economic development. Reason (R): Over the fifty years from 1950, dictatorships had a slightly higher rate of economic growth.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Had democracy guaranteed development, democracies would not have trailed dictatorships in growth.
Q124. A minister argues that since dictatorships grew slightly faster, his country should abandon elections for twenty years. Which reply follows the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the gap is negligible among poor countries, growth depends on other factors, and democracy should be preferred for its several other positive outcomes
The inability to achieve higher growth worries us, but it alone cannot be a reason to reject democracy.
Q125. Two countries both hold free elections, but in one the richest fifth take 64.8 per cent of income and in the other 34.5 per cent. What does this show?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That within democracies there can be very different degrees of inequality
South Africa and Denmark are both democracies, yet the gap between rich and poor differs enormously.
Q126. A researcher wants examples of democracies with relatively even income distribution. Which two does the chapter point to?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Denmark and Hungary
Countries like Denmark and Hungary are much better than South Africa and Brazil in this respect.
Q127. Why does the chapter say it is 'perhaps more than development' reasonable to expect democracies to reduce economic disparities?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because democracies are based on political equality, so a fairer share of what is produced seems a natural thing to expect of them
A system that gives every individual equal weight in elections invites the expectation of a just distribution too.
Q128. Every adult in a country has one vote of equal value, yet the income gap between rich and poor keeps widening. Which contrast does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Between political equality and growing economic inequality
Parallel to bringing individuals into politics on an equal footing, we find growing economic inequalities.
Q129. A report finds that a small group of the very wealthy has increased its share of national income every year for a decade. Which feature of democracies does this describe?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A small number of ultra-rich enjoying a highly disproportionate and increasing share of wealth and incomes
At the other end, those at the bottom have very little to depend upon and their incomes have been declining.
Q130. Consider the following statements about inequality in democracies. I. Democracies are based on political equality. II. Economic inequalities have been growing alongside it. III. The share of the ultra-rich in total income has been increasing. IV. Democracies have been very successful in reducing economic inequalities. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct; democratic systems have not substantially narrowed economic gaps.
Q131. In an election, every party promises to lift the poor out of poverty, since they make up a large share of the electorate. Afterwards little changes. Which observation of the chapter does this fit?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democratically elected governments do not appear as keen to address poverty as one would expect, even though no party wants to lose the votes of the poor
The poor constitute a large proportion of voters, which is what makes the weak record surprising.
Q132. Why is democracy's weak record on poverty described as surprising rather than expected?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because the poor are a large proportion of voters and no party wants to lose their votes
Votes from the poor seem to promise attention to poverty that has not followed.
Q133. A student reasons: democracy is rule by the majority; the poor are the majority; so democracy must be rule by the poor. What does the chapter's evidence show about this reasoning?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That it is not borne out, since elected governments do not appear as keen to address poverty as expected
A majority that is poor does not automatically produce government for the poor, and the chapter leaves this as a failure to be explained.
Q134. A poor country imports much of its grain through aid and purchase from wealthy nations. Which observation of the chapter does this match?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That some poor countries depend on richer countries even for food
This is offered as evidence that the situation is much worse in some countries.
Q135. Which pairing of a question with the chapter's verdict is correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Do democracies reduce inequality? — Not very successfully
The other three misstate the verdict, which is weak on growth, inequality and poverty without being a reason for rejection.
Q136. Why does this section rely on tables of figures rather than on arguments from principle?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because although arguments about democracy are passionate, the debate about its economic outcomes can and should be resolved by facts and figures
Some debates about democracy appeal to deep values; this one can be settled by evidence.
Q137. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democracies do not appear very successful in reducing economic inequalities. Reason (R): Democracies are based on political equality, with every individual having equal weight in electing representatives.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Both are true, but political equality does not explain the failure to reduce inequality — it is what makes that failure surprising.
Q138. Which of the following is NOT a factor the chapter names as affecting economic development?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The number of political parties
The four named factors are population size, the global situation, cooperation from other countries, and economic priorities.
Q139. How does the correction from the first topic — that democracy is just a form of government — bear on the economic record?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
It explains the careful verdict 'no guarantee, but no lag', since a form of government cannot by itself decide population, the global situation or cooperation from other countries
The economic record is where expecting too much of a form of government would most easily mislead.
Q140. A family in a country with rising national income cannot afford both school fees and medical treatment. Which point of the chapter does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That even when a country achieves growth, wealth may not be distributed so that all citizens share in it and lead a better life
The chapter asks whether growth in democracies is accompanied by increased inequalities, and finds that it can be.
Q141. Consider the following about democracy and economic growth. I. Across all countries, dictatorships grew slightly faster from 1950 to 2000. II. Among poor countries the difference was negligible. III. Development depends on several factors besides government. IV. Democracy guarantees economic development. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct; democracy is not a development guarantee.
Q142. An economist says democracy has failed economically and should be judged a failure overall. What does the chapter's overall position suggest?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the economic record is among democracy's least favourable, but democracy does not lag behind dictatorships on growth and should be preferred for its several other positive outcomes
The chapter reports the weakness frankly without treating one weak area as a verdict on the whole.
Q143. Which statement best describes how the chapter treats the gap between growth figures for all countries and for poor countries?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
It uses the poor-country figures to show that the apparent advantage of dictatorships nearly disappears among less developed countries
Reading the table in two steps is what prevents a misleading conclusion.
Q144. Why might equal votes fail to produce equal incomes?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because political equality in elections does not by itself distribute wealth, and inequality has grown alongside it
The chapter records the two developing in parallel rather than one correcting the other.
Q145. Which country's figures show the top 20 per cent taking 50.0 per cent and the bottom 20 per cent 4.0 per cent of national income?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
USA
The USA sits between the very unequal South Africa and Brazil and the much more even Denmark and Hungary.
Q146. Why is slower economic growth not a reason to reject democracy?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q147. Explain the contrast between political equality and economic inequality in democracies.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q148. Why is democracy's record on poverty surprising?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q149. Assess democracy's overall economic record.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q150. Two communities compete fiercely for jobs and political power but settle every dispute through elections and courts rather than riots. Which feature of democracy does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A procedure to conduct competition, which reduces the possibility of tensions becoming explosive or violent
Groups still compete; the contest simply has rules.
Q151. A politician promises that democracy will end all conflict between the country's communities for ever. What is wrong with the promise?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
No society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts among different groups
Democracy is best suited to respecting and negotiating differences, not to abolishing them.
Q152. A government refuses to acknowledge that a large linguistic minority exists, and bans its organisations. How does the chapter describe this kind of response?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because authoritarian systems may ignore or silence internal divisions
Ignoring or suppressing a difference avoids it rather than dealing with it.
Q153. Why does the chapter follow its 'definite plus point' immediately with the Sri Lankan example?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
To show that the plus point holds only when two conditions are met, since a democracy can still fail to accommodate diversity
The ability to handle social differences is a plus point of democratic regimes, but it is conditional.
Q154. A government wins a narrow majority and then passes every measure it likes without consulting any other group. Which condition has it failed?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That majority rule must include cooperation with minorities
A majority must cooperate with minorities so government reflects a wider public view.
Q155. A citizen finds herself in the majority on a question of taxation and in the minority on a question of school language policy. Which idea does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That majority and minority opinions are not permanent
A majority forms on a particular question; change the question and the majority changes.
Q156. In a country, one language group wins every election simply because it outnumbers all the others combined, and members of other groups never form part of a governing majority. Which condition has failed?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That rule by majority must not become rule by majority community in terms of religion, race or linguistic group
When the majority is fixed by community, different persons and groups can no longer form a majority.
Q157. What does rule by majority properly mean, according to the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That different groups can form a majority on different decisions
A majority is a temporary coalition of opinions on a question, not a permanent group.
Q158. A group is legally free to vote, but because of the community it is born into it can never be part of any governing majority. What does the chapter say about such a group?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democratic rule has ceased to be accommodative for it, since it is barred from being in majority on the basis of birth
Having a vote is not enough if birth permanently decides which side one is on.
Q159. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democratic rule ceases to be accommodative for a group barred from ever being in the majority on the basis of birth. Reason (R): Democracy must leave every citizen a real possibility of joining a majority at some stage.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
A group denied that chance by birth has lost what makes democratic rule accommodative.
Q160. How do the two conditions differ from each other?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The first concerns how decisions are made, requiring the majority to work with the minority; the second concerns who can ever be in the majority, forbidding a fixed majority community
Keeping them apart is what earns both marks in an answer.
Q161. Belgium and Sri Lanka were both democracies, yet one accommodated its ethnic differences and the other did not. How does this section explain the difference?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
By whether the two conditions — the majority working with the minority, and majority not becoming rule by a community — were met
The same form of government produced different results, and the conditions explain why.
Q162. Consider the following statements about democracy and social diversity. I. Democracies develop procedures to conduct their competition. II. No society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts among groups. III. Non-democratic regimes often suppress internal social differences. IV. Majority and minority opinions are permanent. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct. Majority and minority opinions are not permanent.
Q163. A margin note objects that democracy only stops people breaking each other's heads, which is not harmony. Which response fits the chapter?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the chapter claims no perfect harmony, and keeping disagreement non-violent is the condition under which respect and negotiation can begin
No society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts; democracy is best suited to respecting and negotiating them.
Q164. Why is suppressing a social difference not the same as accommodating it?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because suppression avoids the difference rather than respecting and negotiating it, and often stores up the conflict it hides
Non-democratic regimes often turn a blind eye to or suppress differences; democracies are best suited to negotiating them.
Q165. Which statement about majorities in a democracy is correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
A majority is formed on a particular question and different persons and groups can form it at different times
Rule by majority means different persons and groups may and can form a majority in every decision or election.
Q166. What does the chapter mean by 'accommodative' democratic rule?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Rule under which every citizen and group retains a chance of being in the majority, so no one is permanently locked out
Rule ceases to be accommodative for anyone barred from the majority on the basis of birth.
Q167. Which pairing of a response to social difference with the kind of regime is correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Evolving mechanisms to negotiate differences — democracy, which is best suited to it
The other three attach the response to the wrong kind of regime, or claim what no society can do.
Q168. Why is the phrase 'at some point of time' important in the chapter's test?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because the requirement is not that everyone is in the majority now, but that no one is permanently excluded from ever being so
Being in the minority on some questions is normal; being barred from the majority for ever is what destroys accommodation.
Q169. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Democracy is best suited to producing respect for social differences. Reason (R): Belgium successfully negotiated differences among its ethnic populations.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Belgium is an example of accommodation, but the reason democracy is best suited is that it develops procedures and mechanisms to negotiate differences, not that one country succeeded.
Q170. A majority community argues that since it has the most votes, it is entitled to decide every question in its own favour for ever. Which part of the chapter answers this?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That rule by majority must not become rule by majority community, and democracy remains democracy only while every citizen has a chance of being in the majority
This is exactly the failure Sri Lanka illustrates.
Q171. Which of the following is NOT one of the two conditions a democracy must fulfil to accommodate diversity?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That every community must be represented in exact proportion to its population
Proportional representation of communities is not a condition the chapter states; the last option is the test that follows from the second condition.
Q172. Why does the chapter say democracy is best suited to handling social diversity, rather than simply that it is good at it?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because it develops procedures for competition and mechanisms to negotiate differences, while non-democratic regimes tend to ignore or suppress them
'Best suited' is a comparison with the alternatives, the chapter's recurring test.
Q173. A student writes that since Sri Lanka was a democracy, its conflict proves democracy cannot accommodate diversity. What is the correction?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That Sri Lanka shows a democracy must meet two conditions to accommodate diversity, not that democracy cannot do so — Belgium shows it can
The example is used as a reminder of conditions, not as a refutation.
Q174. Consider the following about the second condition. I. Rule by majority must not become rule by majority community. II. Different persons and groups may form a majority in every decision. III. Anyone barred from the majority by birth is no longer accommodated. IV. The largest religious group should form the permanent majority. Which of the statements given above are correct?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
I, II and III
I, II and III are correct. Statement IV describes precisely the failure the condition forbids.
Q175. Which statement best captures the relationship between this section and the chapter on power sharing?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
The two conditions here generalise the lesson of Belgium and Sri Lanka: accommodation depends on not letting a majority community dominate
The contrast between accommodation and majoritarian dominance runs through both.
Q176. A coalition government includes a party that opposed most of its partners on education but agrees with them on the economy. What does this show about majorities?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That different persons and groups can come together to form a majority on a particular question
Majorities form on questions, which is why majority and minority opinions are not permanent.
Q177. Why does the chapter use the word 'fair' to describe the expectation that democracy should produce a harmonious social life?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because democracies have been seen to accommodate social divisions, as in Belgium, though no society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts
The expectation is reasonable and partly supported, without being a promise of perfect harmony.
Q178. Why is the ability to handle social differences called a definite plus point of democracy?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q179. Explain the first condition a democracy must fulfil to accommodate social diversity.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q180. Explain the second condition a democracy must fulfil to accommodate social diversity.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q181. What lesson does Sri Lanka teach about democracy and social diversity?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q182. Why is being in the minority on some questions compatible with democracy, but being barred from the majority by birth is not?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
—
Q183. After finding democracy's record mixed on government and weak on economic outcomes, where does the chapter say democracy is much superior to any other form of government?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
In promoting the dignity and freedom of the individual
This is the outcome on which the chapter speaks with the most confidence.
Q184. Two neighbours quarrel repeatedly because one feels the other never treats him with due respect. Which observation of the chapter does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That every individual wants respect from fellow beings, and conflicts often arise when some feel they are not treated with due respect
The passion for respect and freedom is described as the basis of democracy.
Q185. A reformer argues that democracy exists mainly to deliver economic growth. Which statement from the chapter points to a different foundation?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That respect and freedom are central democratic values
Dignity is not an extra added to democracy; it is what democracy rests on.
Q186. A student writes that democracies have fully achieved dignity and freedom for all. What does the chapter actually say?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That democracies have recognised dignity and freedom at least in principle and achieved them in various degrees
The claim is about recognition, not full achievement.
Q187. Why is it not a simple matter for some societies to recognise that all individuals are equal?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because many social systems were shaped by long histories of domination
Long habits of hierarchy make recognition of equality slow and difficult.
Q188. A woman denied equal pay takes her employer to court and points to the law in her support. What made her struggle easier, on the chapter's account?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That once the principle of women's equal treatment is recognised, mistreatment becomes unacceptable legally and morally
Recognition gives her struggle a legal and moral basis to appeal to.
Q189. Why would the same woman's struggle be harder in a non-democratic set-up?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because the unacceptability of her mistreatment would have no legal basis, individual freedom and dignity lacking legal and moral force
The difference lies not in whether injustice exists but in whether it has a foundation.
Q190. Read the Assertion and Reason and choose the correct option. Assertion (A): Women in democracies are not always treated with respect. Reason (R): Long struggles by women have created some sensitivity that respect and equal treatment of women are necessary ingredients of a democratic society.
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Both are stated in the chapter, but the sensitivity created by struggle does not explain why respect is still lacking.
Q191. Decades of campaigning by women's groups in a country have not ended discrimination, but have made equal treatment of women widely accepted as essential to democratic life. How does the chapter describe this result?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
As some sensitivity that respect to and equal treatment of women are necessary ingredients of a democratic society
The gain is real and incomplete; women are still not always treated with respect.
Q192. A Dalit family is denied entry to a public place, and its complaint is registered as a crime rather than dismissed as custom. Which point of the chapter does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That caste-based inequalities and atrocities still occur but lack moral and legal foundations
Democracy in India has strengthened the claims of disadvantaged castes for equal status and opportunity.
Q193. A critic points to continuing caste atrocities as proof that democracy has done nothing for dignity. What is the chapter's reply?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That such atrocities still occur but now lack moral and legal foundations, and democracy has strengthened the claims of disadvantaged castes
Injustice without a legal or moral foundation is on the defensive, which is itself a change.
Q194. What does the chapter suggest makes ordinary citizens value their democratic rights?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Perhaps the recognition of their dignity that those rights represent
Rights are valued because they recognise the person who holds them.
Q195. A village that obtained a school after years of demands now demands a hospital. Which idea from the chapter does this illustrate?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because each democratic gain can create fresh demands for improvement
Passing one test produces another; the benefit gained becomes the baseline for the next demand.
Q196. Why do people asked about the way democracy functions always come up with more expectations and many complaints?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because each improvement creates new demands for still better government
Rising expectations follow from benefits gained, not from their absence.
Q197. A newspaper survey records widespread complaints about the government, and the editor concludes that democracy has failed. What does the chapter say about such complaints?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
That the fact that people complain is itself a testimony to the success of democracy
Complaint shows awareness and the ability to look critically at power holders.
Q198. Why do complaints about democracy show that people have changed?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
Because complaints show that citizens are alert and willing to judge powerful people
Complaint presupposes that power holders can be questioned.
Q199. People in a town who once accepted whatever officials decided now publicly demand explanations for unbuilt roads. What transformation does the chapter say this reflects?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
From subject to citizen
A public expression of dissatisfaction shows the success of the democratic project.
Q200. Under an old monarchy, villagers bowed to every order of the king's officer; two generations after elections came, their grandchildren question the district officer in public meetings. What change does the chapter say democracy brings about?
AdvancedShow answer & explanation
From subjects into citizens
A public expression of dissatisfaction shows the success of the democratic project.
Your notes can be a kit like these
Every kit here was made from real study material. Point Veda at a chapter, a PDF, a photo or a link and get notes, flashcards, practice MCQs, games and a scored test — free, in 42 languages.
- Chapter notes
- Flashcards
- Practice MCQs
- Scored tests
- Exam prep
Get Veda free See what students get
Free to start · No ads · Works in 42 languages